This is a continuation of my plan to come up with 10 new ideas/projects a day while I’m #funemployed (taking time to figure out what to do next after my Masters degree).
I want to keep this fun (and challenging) so I’m going to stick with 1-5 ideas a day for now. I don’t want to force it too much. Want to see if I can at least sustain for this upcoming week. I’ve been trying stay from Bored Elon Musk-esque ideas. I want more practical ideas, not just sci-fi ideas (such as the vapoo-rizer).
4.1) Decentralized journalism.
It bothers me that a government can come in and destroy hard-drives. Currently, journalism suffers from being centralized. We have a lot more voices, but voices can still be silenced. There’s also the sense of trust. We trust The Guardian when they publish articles due to their history. It’s more difficult to trust a random Twitter account. It’s much more difficult to trust a small voice.
I think there are ideas in Bitcoin and the blockchain that can usher in a form of anonymous, "trust-less", decentralized approach to journalism. Entities like Wikileaks are already distributing large files through the torrent protocol to mitigate centralization. They then encrypt it, and keep a private key or passphrase to eventually decrypt it. As a sort-of “kill-switch”.
The other thing that I think decentralized journalism through a blockchain type system can introduce is the idea of proof-of-work. We are stuck in real-time, always-on, world of news. The incentives are more aligned for media to produce link-bait. It’s better for them to be first, even though it is sucky journalism, because the real-time nature of the web incentivizes it. There are very little signals that indicate that articles are actually good: it’s only the title (before you click through). With a proof-of-work system, there will hopefully be incentive to ‘signal’ that you did proper research and you are invested in the integrity of the article you are publishing.
Because Bitcoin is also a “shared ledger”, there’s no central authority to shut down. Like you see sites like blockchain.info and blockexplorer.com build sites on top of the ledger. The incentive for the network will also be to create the best “views” into the decentralized journalism ledger.
The other benefit is that a blockchain-system is already a well-secured timestamping “machine”. You can “prove” that you were first with a story. Also the idea of addresses serving as “inputs” to a new “story” (the outputs). There’s something here…
Of course, this idea needs refinement, and the details need to be worked out. But I like the potential of it.
4.2) Brain interface to sculpt and print 3D objects.
I adore this Jason Silva piece:
"Thoughts spill over into technology" and "We take matter and extrude it through our mental filters into iPhones and space shuttles". I like the idea of decreasing the point of ‘idea’ to creation. So now we have 3D printers, but we must still use computers to ‘sculpt’ and create. It would be awesome to have a brain interface to immediately take what is in your mind, and then within 5 minutes see it printed.
The brain is malleable and can assimilate virtual limbs. It seems possible that we can imagine 3D sculptures and then have it printed in less than 30min. Even more basic you can do the whole “resting” brain-waves vs “awake” brain-waves trick to build a virtual etch-a-sketch.
4.3) More virtual keyboards.
I feel we should definitely be exploring more with keyboards. Physical keyboards were restricted to change due the physical constraints of not being able to change it on the fly. And thus QWERTY became the defacto standard. Look at minuum (the link above). It’s such a new and interesting way to work with a keyboard. But you don’t even have to go that far out. DVORAK, for example, can easily be swapped in and out in virtual keyboards (especially great for tablets). No one will be confused. You can use what works for you.
Children now growing up don’t have to work the current QWERTY standard. What new keyboards will work well? Are there better layouts? Are there more intuitive layouts (looking at how children adopt tech)? I bet there is. There needs to more.
I was a bit busy this weekend, and I’m prepping for my visit to the East (which is next week), so not sure how much I’m going to be able to work on new ideas. Just trying to have fun (and do other things as well). Perhaps an idea a day is more feasible at this stage. I’m curious to see if there will be a tipping point where new ideas eventually just rush in. I suspect this will be like any other habit. You’ve got to keep working on it, and practice.
This is a continuation of my plan to come up with 10 new ideas/projects a day while I’m #funemployed (taking time to figure out what to do next after my Masters degree).
3.1) Amorphous bands.
This was inspired a while back by guys impersonating a local band (Fokofpolisiekar). They didn’t claim to be a cover band. For a skit, they claimed they were literally them. It’s an interesting idea. A band creates music under a moniker and anyone else is allowed to perform under that name, for nothing in return, and even claim to BE them (on bills, festivals, whatever). It also stems from the problem that growing your music in the digital age can still be slow, especially if you are a band who is good live. You can only play so many gigs a year, and grow only so fast.
3.2) Microwaves that show the heat on the door.
How many times do you have to take your bowl out, feel if is hot or not (and equally so across your whole meal), only to put it back in? Show the heat level of the contents while you are microwaving it.
3.3) Community based knowledge/expertise marketplace.
There’s so much latent expertise that exist in local communities and they aren’t used to the benefit of the community as a whole. There should be an easy way for someone to sign up to help one hour a week with some maths for the local school kids. Something like that.
3.4) Recyclables for 3D printing plastic.
Spoke to some friends about this today. Ideally you would want to smelt off refuse into 3D printing material, but that won’t work too well. So the next best thing is to trade in your recyclables for 3D printing plastic. You can trade in existing 3D printing plastic for it as well (stuff you’ve created that you don’t want anymore).
3.5) Queue QS
I’m curious how much I actually spend my time in queues. Should be interesting to see how much time it takes out of my day. A QS device that measures this should be interesting.
3.6) Slow web social network.
There’s no feed. You only get results of what your friends have shared and what they are up to through daily digests. Like daily newspapers, but for social networks. You could even distill it further down. You are only allowed to share one moment a day (you can swap them in and out before they are put into a digest). Finite, no-nonsense, social sharing.
3.7) Streaming micropayments with Bitcoin.
With the new micropayment channels in Bitcoin developed by Mike Hearn, it is possible to send small amounts of Bitcoin to someone without flooding the network. There’s some cool possible implementations. You could listen to a song on a site. Once done, you’ve already paid what you’ve listened for. Very cool.
3.8) Subscription shades.
There’s probably something like this out there. The reason I want this: I break shades way to often. This is why I’m getting Sun Gods. I like different shades, so it would be cool to receive new ones every month with different styles, for cheap.
3.9) Share happiness.
No, it’s not a Coke ad. You open the app, it shows where you are, one tap, and it creates a pin with a smiley face on the app. It stays for a few hours, then disappears. Sometimes you just want to anonymously “affirm” your contentedness, if you are in such a situation. Other people can open up the app and see if people are happy around them. It’s all anonymous. And ideally it should be language neutral. Should be an interesting experiment.
3.10) Serendipity potential.
If I check in on Foursquare each day, Foursquare has data on people nearby whom I can bump into and meet. Should be interesting to know if there are people who have been close by, but I’ve never met. Sort of like, if I have checked into places close to certain people, our “serendipity potential” gets higher. Should be more interesting to see if there are people who I’ve crossed paths with that aren’t ‘local’. ie, coincidentally in different parts of the world. It reminds of the time I was in Singapore for a competition. We met Nima there. Afterwards our team travelled to Kuala Lumpur. Not knowing that he was also travelling there with this gf, we bumped into them in a massive crowded market. The next day, we bumped into them again in a massive mall. All these coincidental meetings. How often are they ACTUALLY occurring without us knowing?
Today was tough. Had to dig up some old ideas again, although I try not to. Thinking of perhaps doing themed ideas, so I can delve deeper and seek specific problems to solve.
Previous: Ideas #2
This is a continuation of my plan to come up with 10 new ideas/projects a day while I’m #funemployed (taking time to figure out what to do next after my Masters degree).
2.1) Cryptocurrency where POW = free computation.
Primecoin's is unique. It's where the proof of work is used to generate prime chains. It is really novel. Not only is the cryptocurrency then securing the network but ALSO adding scientific benefit by producing primechains. Could there perhaps be a cryptocurrency where the network of computers can be used towards a wider variety of scientific benefit, ie providing free computation?
2.2) Plastic cups that don’t tip.
This has been a pet peeve forever. Yoghurt cups where once you are done eating the delicious goodness, the cup tips when you put the spoon in. #firstworldproblems.
2.4) Always-on scrobbler/shazam.
I religiously use last.fm and want it to accurately reflect what I listen to each day, even when it is on the radio or TV. Would be cool to have a device that listens and records the songs you’ve heard during the day.
2.5) Digital, phone-based vouchers.
This stems from my irritation of giving money to beggars. I don’t do it anymore. I want to know the person is going to buy something useful. Would be great to be able to generate a voucher (possibly at USSD level for feature phones) so people can spend it at stores for bread. Bitcoin comes to mind here. Sean’s Outpost is doing something similar. I recall reading they were giving Bitcoin to the homeless, instead of cash. Also, just check how cool this thread is. Shows the power of Bitcoin. Instant cash transfer through Reddit to Sean’s Outpost!
2.6) Removing 3rd parties in transactions on the web with deterministic address generation in Bitcoin.
You can generate additional public keys in Bitcoin (according to the specs of the BIP 32 protocol) on behalf of other people, if you have their master public key. Think of it is this way. You can generate additional “safety deposit boxes” in this shared ledger that only a specific person can make keys to.
What this means, is that for sites like Min.io, you don’t really need a 3rd-party. The 3rd-party’s main job in this regard is keeping track of addresses (what unique address fits what you are selling). Electrum already has a form of deterministic address generation in it, and the WooCommerce Bitcoin plugin takes advantage of this. But the idea is pretty big. It could potentially disrupt even big incumbents such as Stripe. You won’t need them anymore (at least just for payment processing).
2.7) Friend of a friend chat app.
Many people meet new people through friends of friends. Make a chat app (using FB’s social graph) that pairs up friend of friend. The ‘game’ of the app would be to guess who is the mutual connection. This of course means asking question such as “where are you from?”, “where did you go to school”, etc. Questions that are perfect to quickly get to know someone new.
2.8) Real life Oculus Rift portals.
Make hardware 360 degree cameras (open source the design) and ask people to drop them anywhere on the planet. With the Oculus Rift, you could then “portal in”, in real-time to these locations all across the Earth and just have a look around. Could be awesome! The portals themselves don’t move. The visual are manipulated so that you can look as if you are there. This means more than one person can “portal in” to any location.
2.9) Augmented reality live shows.
Almost like this. Imagine people standing in a crowd and you can have extra, crazy visuals everywhere. With epic music!
2.10) AI-driven public spaces.
Public spaces that change according to various variables: how many people there are, what the sentiment of the day in the city is, what led to serendipitous encounters, etc. The “AI” then controls this public space to make it fit better to different scenarios.
This was an interesting day. Dusted off some old ideas and mostly “big” ideas. I think I’m going to hit some “wall” and then a tipping point where new ideas will just start rolling in uncontrollably!
So, after reading James Altucher’s post on 'how to have great ideas', I thought it would be cool to think of 10 new ideas/projects each day, if I can. I gave in my masters thesis on Monday, so I’m officially #funemployed. I’m not quite sure what I want to do with my life next, so I’m taking some time off to think things through. This is going to a be a nice experiment. The ideas doesn’t necessarily have to be a new and innovative, just something I think would be cool to do (or to have).
1) Bitcoin exchange for Africa.
Africa is set to benefit a lot if it adopts Bitcoin, especially in terms of remittances. An exchange that can take this future market will be poised for success (focuses on African countries).
2) Enterprise social media backups.
I’ve often gotten requests from TwimeMachine users that are more related to enterprise level social media management. I think companies would find it useful to want backups of their social media history (Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, etc) and have it easily searchable. Should just be a “turnkey” solution.
3) Better education about nutrition.
I recently discovered that sugar does NOT in fact make kids hyper. Years of being taught old wives tales. There must be an easier to easily get information about nutrition. ie, something like: scan ingredients, get brief overview of what the average effects will be (you’ll feel a bit drowsy, you’ll have to burn so much calories). Don’t know enough about nutrition to know if this even possible to distill it in this fashion.
4) Watch that has programmable vibration.
I want a watch that I can connect to my smartphone and then be able to program discreet vibrations (depending on app and message). Allows me to not have to check my phone each time it does something (could just be an app update notification).
5) Listenwithus.com summary emails.
I run http://listenwithus.com. Thinking of adding a feature where the most shared songs are emailed to users who opt-in so they don’t have to watch the hashtag the whole time.
6) Give Bitcoin away.
If I buy a lot of Bitcoin, and I give half of it away, will the interest I generate through it increase the price of Bitcoin in such a manner that the other half I own will eventually be more than if I just kept it all?
7) Silicon Cape/Stellenbosch tech media series.
Been thinking of doing a short 4-6 episode series, interviewing and showcasing the awesome tech companies in (mainly) Stellenbosch and then Cape Town. Sort of like Alexis Ohanian’s Small Empires. I’ve been wanting to get more into multimedia.
8) Shots of awe.
Speaking of media. I really dig Jason Silva’s ‘Shots of Awe’. Keen to make one. Would probably be about either Bitcoin or a general one on the amazing times we live in. You know. FUTURE.
9) Travel show where I only use Bitcoin.
More media. I enjoy lifeonbitcoin. But now. Pick businesses on Bitcoin.travel or coinmap.org. Travel to them. Promote Bitcoin. Make series of it.
10) Phone-based classifieds.
Haven’t done any research on this, so it could exist already. Take a photo of something you want to sell, set price, and then it is immediately on a classifieds site. When meeting in person, pay with Bitcoin (as it is easy mobile-based payments).
Having fun with this! I’ll probably continue with this until I leave for holiday on the 16th of September for 2 weeks. Will probably pick it up after that.
I’ve been quite surprised at the rise of stickers. Every phone-based social network seem to be rolling them out. WeChat, Kik and even Path.
My first reaction to this is: Really? It’s not that I think stickers can help in communication, it’s just that it feels like we can, and should be able to convey what they imply through more innovative means.
I understand why they work. If you’ve been on 9Gag or Reddit, you’ll know a host of ragefaces. They sum up responses and feelings really well. Their meaning has also been established as a meme, and you can now use them without even using the picture. Here’s how I’ve seen people use it. They simply ‘reference’ the meme.
You know exactly how they look, you know exactly what message it conveys, and it works. And it often explains feelings/messages better than any text would.
On a phone, typing out long pieces of text is still cumbersome, and probably will be for the foreseeable future. Sometimes, a picture just sums up what you want to convey: It’s quicker and it conveys visual meaning.
For ages I’ve used the “:P” smiley to convey my light-hearted tone in texts. I’ve tried to unlearn it and rather just meet the people in person, and have a chat that way. Body language is still king in communication.
Stickers fit this ‘gap’ in mobile communication. It is emoticons on steroids. And of course, the social networks love it, because they can monetize some part of the communication.
But. Although it provides more tools to convey meaning, it still feels like a contrived manner in which to communicate. It feels like a local optimization to a problem, while there exists a higher peak.
And I think an app like SnapChat is going in the right direction. What better way to communicate than to just show someone how you feel? It doesn’t however cover all the use cases. You don’t ALWAYS want to communicate with pictures.
And this is where referencing rage faces comes in. I think there’s a clue here somewhere. Something like trying to effortlessly increase a text’s capability with meaning by imbuing it with visual connotations.
Thinking off the cuff here. What about if you say: “I’m sad”. Swipe right, and it shows you photos of sad faces (yours, or other (zeitgeist-ish)). Or if you say: “It’s sunny today.” Swipe right, and you have photos of sunny weather. Or if you say: “I can’t believe you did this!” Swipe right and show pictures of despondent people.
What are your thoughts on stickers? Can we make something better?
There’s an interesting discussion happening on Fred Wilson’s blog about the choice between physical and digital news (including comments from Seth Godin and Jeff Jarvis).
(pic by Jack Cheng)
It rekindled my thoughts around news and the race between digital and physical. I’m probably one of the few people of the ‘new, connected’ generation that actually still enjoy reading newspapers. My parents still buy “Die Burger” (daily Afrikaans newspapers) and “Die Rapport” + “Sunday Times” on Sundays (weekly newspapers).
I enjoy reading it either in the morning or night (usually when there’s no company around the table). Would I buy ‘Die Burger’? Nope. But I still enjoy it for what it is. Catering news to a specific market. However, what I like most about newspapers is that the content is ‘done’, when it is ‘done’. That’s what physical newspapers still provide. There’s no expectation or the possibility of extra content. When we are subjected to a constant fire-hose of information, where there will ALWAYS be more information, it makes people anxious.
That’s why I don’t frequent newspaper’s digital sites. It’s “always-on” news, and you don’t always want ‘always-on’ news. There are news that can wait a day, or 2, or 3. Important “emergency” news will find it’s way through Twitter, Facebook, G+, etc. But most news just aren’t ‘emergency’ news.
Here’s a correlation to this published by Fastcolabs. They coined it: “slow live blogging”.
Here’s what we learned about long form stories—and why quality, not velocity, is the future of online news.
Physical newspapers to my mind have 3 features that make it different than other forms of news consumption:
Like I mentioned previously. It’s done when it is done. Jack Cheng sums it up well in his blog post about the "Slow Web Movement". Timely vs Real-time.
Real-time interactions happen as they happen. Timely ones, on the other hand, happen as you need them to happen. Some real-time interactions, like breaking news about an earthquake, can be timely. But not all timely interactions are real-time. I’d argue that most are not. And where the Fast Web is built around real-timedness, the Slow Web is built around timeliness.
A great example of a Slow Web product is Instapaper. Instapaper takes the process of discovering a long article and reading it on the spot (real-time) and breaks it apart, deferring the act of reading until later, when we have an extended moment to read (timely). I may be stretching my analogy a bit here, but it’s kind of like boxing up a meal and putting it away in the fridge for when you’re hungry, except in this case, it doesn’t lose as much of its taste.
2) Niche market.
I say this in terms of news. There’s layers of news, and it filters down and down and down, to eventual hyperlocal news. For any type of product, knowing the market means much better content, instead of going for a “shotgun” approach. It feels like newspaper companies, in fear of digital, tries to do a shotgun approach, trying to ‘connect’ news to events that are only vaguely related to their market.
Sean Parker, in his post lambasting the media for his wedding coverage, says:
A kind of mob mentality reigns supreme in the unrestricted, uncivilized world of social media: whether it is found on Facebook, on Twitter, in blogs, or even in the remnants of traditional journalism, where the old guard is now forced to compete with the instantaneous news cycle of the “real-time web” and the blogosphere. The economics of this new media have, in so many ways, rendered obsolete the economics of the old journalism and the value system that went along with it. The ethics of journalism, a commitment to objectivity, accuracy, and civility, formed a kind of loose social contract between the creators and consumers of news.
Read the whole last section. Poignant stuff. The result is poor news. It’s like news “inflation”. Everyone’s losing, but everyone has to play this game. To compare, it’s like the classic case of competitors racing themselves to zero margins, because they think they can only compete on price. Niche news is valuable because 1) larger news players don’t provide it, 2) it doesn’t have to be “always-on” and 3) it benefits from shared culture.
3) Shared culture.
To continue with the idea of a niche market. Newspapers were cornerstones of shared culture. That’s how information propagated. If you read the local daily news, you’d know that most people would’ve read it, and thus that becomes part of the zeitgeist. With ultra-recommendations, we start to live in bubbles of information. That is going missing.
I say there’s a need for carefully curated, finite news that caters to niche markets. Be like “The Magazine”.
The Magazine publishes five medium-length articles every two weeks on a wide variety of subjects of interest to curious people.
Keen to hear your thoughts. If you have stopped buying local newspapers, why? Would you pay for finite, digitally delivered news? Keen to hear your thoughts!
One of Bitcoin’s unique features is that value can be moved around in a much more liquid fashion than any previous forms of money. Anything that can be touched digitally can touch upon Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is the first truly decentralized form of money. No one controls it. This possibility is exciting. It’s a state-less currency. We are seeing the ramifications of this already (people being paid with Bitcoin in jobs where what you create is not bound to the idea of a state: such as digital freelance work). The idea of a state-less currency means any nation’s currency will contend with Bitcoin. There will be countless ins and outs into the currency. I’m not sure yet whether it will happen, but it seems possible that Bitcoin will become the reserve currency of the world, rather than another nation’s currency (such is the case now with the USD). The problem with having another nation’s currency as the reserve currency is the political implications (and trust).
An example of this is the BRICS recent decision to increase trade in their own currencies rather than rely on the USD. Even if a country despises the US, the USD is still regarded as the ‘reserve currency’ and other countries reluctantly have to deal with it, because that’s where trust and value lies. But, if there is a neutral currency, then trust will gravitate towards it over time as distrust breaks down relationships between nation-type currencies.
Now, what I actually want to say. If you look at Bitcoin simply as an equivalent to a real world currency, the in and outs into it will be nation’s currencies. However, as I mentioned, Bitcoin is digital. Anything that is digital will and can affect it’s value.
This means Bitcoin is also reality-less (for lack of a better term) currency. And easily so. Virtual economies have always been valuable, but its always been restrictive in terms of money flowing into and out of it. You have your traditional MMOs where ‘black market’ trading of Gold and items exist (such as in WoW), and then you have your more open MMOs like Second Life and Entropia Universe where trading money into the world is accepted.
Famously, a $635,000 island was sold in Entropia.
However, as I stated, liquidity is hampered like any current traditional exchange. With Bitcoin, there’s no reason why any virtual items and goods can sold in the game for Bitcoin and use the Bitcoin protocol immediately. So, now you can see that not only will nation-currencies contend with Bitcoin, but virtual currencies as well. And it can more easily exist without having to even need a separate currency (such as is the case with current MMOs).
So, just imagine. You walk into your local pub and pay with Bitcoin. Have a few drinks with your buddies. You get back home and play an MMO and with that same Bitcoin, you buy virtual items. All the transactions go through the Bitcoin protocol (you don’t have to use the protocol. You can keep it off-chain). The items sold in the game are immediately deposited into your wallet. It’s seamless like you’ve never seen it before.
There are examples surfacing of this:
Dragon’s Roulette. MMO casino powered with Bitcoin.
Bitstrat (in early beta). Wager on skill-based games.
(I recall seeing another one where the in world game uses Bitcoin as currency, but can’t find it now. If you know, link it please).
I do want to see a fully fledged game that focuses on Bitcoin as currency and uses it’s strengths in such a game.
So yeah. It’s not farfetched to imagine virtual worlds also contending along with nation-currencies with Bitcoin. It’s exciting!
Earlier this year, one of my best friends found himself in a bar, having a drink with another friend. A girl at the table next to them started chatting to him. Not only are they dating now, but one of her friends is dating another friend of mine. This seemingly coincidental event led to significant changes in people’s lives. What if they didn’t decide to venture out to that bar that night? Or simply sat further away? They wouldn’t have met.
These sort of accidental meetings happen every day, and has always happened. You meet people through hops and acquaintances. My first serious girlfriend, for example, I met because of a series of events: 1) failing to qualify for a play, 2) getting a role in another play, 3) meeting the director’s sister, 4) who lived with my ex.
Each day is riddled with potential exciting new people you can meet. Avenues that are long and wide, that is simply a proverbial “small door” away.
But today. In our current age, it just becomes worse. Opportunities to connect to people have exploded. I’ve met the most amazing people through Twitter. I’ve seen amazing photos of strangers on Instagram. I’ve connected with like-minded musicians on SoundCloud. The list goes on. It’s exciting!
And then I think. Man. I might each moment be missing out on experiences that define people’s lives. Rian (@rianvdm), recently linked a post by Scott Berkun about information overload. It struck me, that my feelings toward information ‘overload’ isn’t necessarily about an increase the amount of information, but more that increased connectedness brings about too many opportunities that are within reach.
We do heuristically filter information. That I’ve gathered from my Masters research into information overload. Our brains are effective at managing too much information, even when faced with the so-called ‘information explosion’.
But, what we miss, is the opportunity to experience. Our opportunity costs to do anything in an increasingly connected world becomes higher and higher. For example, a second difference on Omegle can mean the difference of entirely different lives! That’s exciting and depressing at the same time. When I told Rian that, he sent me a link to a post by Linda Holmes, and it sums it up quite well:
That’s the moment you realize you’re separated from so much. That’s your moment of understanding that you’ll miss most of the music and the dancing and the art and the books and the films that there have ever been and ever will be, and right now, there’s something being performed somewhere in the world that you’re not seeing that you would love.
And, that’s life, I guess. Just like my friend who met the girl he is dating now in a random moment, we can curate our lives with people we want to, on the internet. We can connect to so maaany opportunities!
As I near the end of my Masters (less than a month left), I’m faced with certain decisions about what to do next. When accidental moments can mean so much, taking much larger life decisions suddenly feel scary. I will take them. I’m not afraid of that. I know what I will decide I will enjoy. That’s who I am. I make the most of where I am. I enjoy learning. I enjoy people, and their stories. But there’s always a small feeling that your life could’ve been vastly different. And with that in mind, I have to decide where I want to steer my life next.
To make that decision, I started to think about what narrative will mean the most to me at this stage in my life. There are several options that seem interesting. Without divulging too much, they seem to be split up between 1) South Africa, 2) Silicon Valley and 3) Travelling. All 3 choices are “big”. They can set me on paths that can forever change my life. And frankly, I don’t know what to choose at this stage. I keep changing my mind every day.
For now, I’ll just greet smiles and hopefully increase those happy accidental moments. :)
P.S. I do realise that this is probably very normal to feel at this stage in one’s life. C’est la vie.
I’ve thought for a while that the recent ‘sharing economy’ trend (AirBNB, Couchsurfing, Uber, etc) could easily be extended to musicians (especially touring). A friend sent me this TED talk by Amanda Palmer and it just clicked again:
What do most musicians want? They won’t mind being rich from their labours, but most of them would just want to gig, make music and share their music with fans. Today, this means keeping a ‘day-job’ to sustain it until they take the leap and do it full-time.
When a band tours, they need to get there, have some food (and some drink) and a place to crash. That’s all really. The problem now is, is that the band has to “guess” if they have enough support in an area to hopefully cover the loss from their touring. Usually a promoter assumes this risk. This is the internet, and we have a burgeoning sharing economy. It CAN be done differently.
All a band needs are their fans to pay up front for them to come play somewhere. This greatly lowers the costs and assumed risks (for all parties involved). The band can stay at a fan’s pad, be sponsored food and drink, and the venue can be booked by the fans (or even sponsored as well).
The execution needs work, but the idea is there. What do you think?
I started a new side-project (hey, what’s new?).
It’s called #listenwithus. Discover music together.
(I quite like the logo).
The idea for this is quite old. For a while I wanted a way in which people can listen to music together, and share music with a common goal. I originally intended for people to earn badges. ie. Listen to 200 jazz songs. Or listen to 100 songs of the 2000’s.
And then last week I realised it is kinda pointless. Let’s MVP it. Keep it very basic. One theme a week, and that’s it. People share as much as they want.
The goal was to make the hashtag readable as possible without being too large. So I came to: #listenwithus.
The idea is also counter to increasing personalization that is occurring on the web. Everyone is living in their own bubble having individual journeys. We are losing shared culture. A newspaper served as shared culture. And magazines (amongst enthusiasts) as that was the only place where information came to people (besides word of mouth). So I want to bring back some of that shared culture to music. Each week, I will pick a theme and we will share music and discover it together. Suggestions for themes are also welcome!
For now, I’m focusing on Twitter, but other platforms can also be used: App.net, Google+, Facebook, Tumblr, etc. Spam is a potential problem, but I’ll tackle that in the future (have some ways to tackle it).
My definition of success for this is small. If I get one new song a week from the hashtag, I’m happy!
So, let’s share and discover music together. Listen with us!
The first one, is ‘2013’. Find some tweets here: #listenwithus2013.